Who Is Really Behind the (coming) Syrian War ?

Here we go:

Exclusive: USS Nimitz carrier group rerouted for possible help with Syria

I don't know the veracity of this, but it is from yahoo so...

US 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt': Report

I don't know the veracity of this, but it is from yahoo so...

US 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt': Report

Since it seems like it was the rebels that launched the gas, not the Syrian government ( based on an iPhone video taken by said rebels with meta data still included) this seems to be exactly what happened (we have been semi-openly funding/supporting the rebels for a while now).

The us has a history of doing this type of thing to get its citizens to agree to war, so it's not a surprise really.

If the Syrians want to gas their own citizen...let them. Why should the US get involved? Unless there is a different endgame that just Syria.

the dems could blame bush like they do for everything else

If the Syrians want to gas their own citizen...let them. Why should the US get involved? Unless there is a different endgame that just Syria.

watch the video I posted, syria has a large oil pipeline planned that's got a lot of people (countries) 'concerned'

also syria has ties to iran, & we've wanted to get into iran for a while now...

Two birds one stone?

Cooler heads will prevail...

Cooler heads will prevail...

like when we invaded Iraq for WMD's?

Bingo. It also looks like the Senate has agreed to Obama's request to go into Syria.

Bingo. It also looks like the Senate has agreed to Obama's request to go into Syria.

those were the cooler heads right?

9% public approval of action against syria isn't important at all... since the senate represents the states, and the congress represents the people.. wait, aren't the people the state also?

maybe they just slipped a zero into that 9% on accident, if that's the case I understand.

At least the Tea Party folk are holding true. Like Rubio, Rand Paul and a few others.

Cooler heads will prevail...

like when we invaded Iraq for WMD's?

Attacking Syria will rapidly escalate into World War III...the Pentagon is already escalating, and the bombs haven't even started dropping yet. Anybody who believes this will be a "limited" action is fooling themselves. Syria will defend itself, and when that happens the Pentagram will feel compelled to strike even harder.

Lurking in the background is Russia, China, Iran, and Hezb'Allah. Russia will not allow the West to devastate Syria like they did to Libya. Syria has already been bombed three times by Israel, and has vowed to attack Israel in response to any military strikes.

Russia has provided Syria with the most advanced anti-ship missile in existence. Imagine what will happen when Americans see an aircraft carrier sinking into the Mediterranean...they better stay out of range. Unlike Libya and Iraq, Syria is not toothless.

Imagine what will happen in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states when the citizenry rise up, enraged at the destruction of yet another Arab country with the full support of despotic leaders.

Cooler heads will prevail, or we face a nuclear winter. Imagine what will happen when one of those perfectly aimed missiles hits the nuclear reactor in Damascus.

We live in interesting times. Radioactivity has no borders. All those people braying for war should realize that the jet stream and the trade winds know no borders.

The US has no moral ground to attack people based on chemical weapons use. Countless Vietnamese were killed as a result of the usage of Agent Orange, and countless others disfigured. Israel used white phosphorous against Palestinian civilians. The US military routinely uses depleted uranium ammunition, as when Fallujah was destroyed...and birth defects skyrocketed. One of the most iconic pictures in history is that of a Vietnamese girl, running naked and screaming, her clothes burned off by a US napalm attack, her skin hanging in shreds. There is reason to believe that the US-supported rebels, one of whom posted a video of himself eating the heart of a dead Syrian soldier, perpetrated this gassing in order to draw the US into the conflict because Assad was winning. John Kerry is a shameless liar, and in the months to come we will hopefully all be alive when the truth comes out.

For example: this is happening NOW at the G20 summit:

PUTIN GREETS OBAMA WITH SYRIA THREAT - President Obama arrived in Russia today to find the already failing relations with his host in even worse condition. Russian President Vladimir Putin’s threat to provide his Syrian allies with a missile shield in the event of U.S. airstrikes further complicates Obama’s flagging effort to win international support for an attack on Damascus. As the Guardian reports, Putin’s warning that an attack without UN backing would provoke military aid from Russia may drive away the handful of international partners for Obama’s proposed attack.

Video: Syrian Rebel Admits Using Chemical Weapons

The footage adds to the increasing weight of evidence that suggests US-backed rebels possess and have used chemical weapons on more than one occasion, although such reports have been habitually downplayed by the mainstream media.

Video: Syrian Rebel Admits Using Chemical Weapons

The footage adds to the increasing weight of evidence that suggests US-backed rebels possess and have used chemical weapons on more than one occasion, although such reports have been habitually downplayed by the mainstream media.

False flag attack? what's that... never heard of it before...

not during WW1, not during WW2, not during Vietnam,... (all declassified at this point, feel free to look up why those wars started)

Fool me once, shame on me, fool me 20 times... godamn I'm a retard, err, US citizen.

Yesterday I turned on CNN and they were covering 9-11 and what went on, interviews from people and footage. I turned over to Fox and they were doing the same thing! Propaganda to convince the people that we need to go to war to 'get' the bad guys? So odd both channels covering old 9-11 news at the same time. And not on 9-11. I'll never figure any of it out, just depressing.

paula. every year since the attacks they play coverage and specials relating to the 911 attacks. they play these in september when the attacks happened. it is just a coincidence that this is happening at the same time.

Yesterday I turned on CNN and they were covering 9-11 and what went on, interviews from people and footage. I turned over to Fox and they were doing the same thing! Propaganda to convince the people that we need to go to war to 'get' the bad guys? So odd both channels covering old 9-11 news at the same time. And not on 9-11. I'll never figure any of it out, just depressing.

Paula,
To figure it out you have to follow the money, and the globalists who are trying to control access to the world's resources. The upcoming attack on Syria has nothing to do with "humanitarianism"...it is all about pipelines (like the one they don't want to see built through Syria, from Iran), oil, and other natural resources. All countries where the West creates conflicts have coveted natural resources, even the ones they portray as "poor" such as the Sudan. They are gaming "The Grand Chessboard" as envisaged by Kissinger et al. They have built the most effective propaganda system in the history of the human race in order to "manage perception". They have dozens of "think tanks" in DC and other areas where policy is defined...Jimmy Carter said that America is not a democracy, and he is right. When over 90% of the populace is against an attack on Syria and it happens anyway, just who is in charge?

Mr. Obama is being set up for impeachment. He will have committed an impeachable act by going to war without the approval of Congress, and he will have committed an international war crime by attacking a non-threatening country without the approval of the UN.

When he attacks Syria (and it will be a massive attack, because the aim is to destroy the country and split it into pieces), we risk World War Three because Syria is backed by China, Russia, and Iran, and they know that they are next in line for "regime change"...ever notice how the manipulators use the word "regime" instead of "government" to make it sound sinister?

The lunatics are running the asylum. But they have learned from history...just the wrong lessons. They have learned that the American people will not stomach more than 8% of the population being affected by combat casualties, so they send remote controlled drones to kill people instead of sending soldiers. They have pledged "no boots on the ground" in Syria because they know that doing so would result in massive American casualties...and this is politically unacceptable. So the plan is to massively bomb, as usual...except that, this time, the target has the most advanced anti-aircraft missiles available, courtesy of Russia.

Cooler heads will prevail...

Mr. Obama is being set up for impeachment.

"set up"??? No one is "setting him up". He is doing this himself. He has a record of going around the laws and the constitution - he thinks he is above it. There is a whole lot of back room dealing going on and it's so surprising since we were promised "transparency" in this administration. Nothing ever changes in Washington, just the names of the players.

Mr. Obama is being set up for impeachment.

"set up"??? No one is "setting him up". He is doing this himself. He has a record of going around the laws and the constitution - he thinks he is above it. There is a whole lot of back room dealing going on and it's so surprising since we were promised "transparency" in this administration. Nothing ever changes in Washington, just the names of the players.

You're absolutely correct. We expected a whole lot more from a "Professor of Constitutional Law".

http://news.yahoo.com/president-obama-urges-congress-vote-165105755.html

I don't know what the US should do re Syria. What worries me is deciding what our moral obligation is. It seems to be a fact that there was a sarin attack and many people were killed and injured. 100,000 people have been killed during this war. At what point do we, the nations of the world, have no choice but to act? 500,000 dead? 1,000,000? Or perhaps the magic number is 6 million. I think anyone who thinks these are easy decisions is deluding themselves.

I feel deeply for these poor people but I am more disturbed at paragraph 3 of my link where our "elected commander in chief, the "president of the United States," encourages our "elected representatives" to dismiss the will and voice of the majority, to go "against" the very people who elected them to go to war against a nation who has not caused us any harm. Our constitution is, of the people, for the people and by the people. We are the people! For our elected leader to go against and to ask our other elected leaders to go against the wishes of the majority of our population is a person who is against our country. This man is no longer our elected leader. He is a man making decisions on his own. A man who is not representing America or our interests. This is a man with his own agenda.

paula. every year since the attacks they play coverage and specials relating to the 911 attacks. they play these in september when the attacks happened. it is just a coincidence that this is happening at the same time.

Yes, I've seen the coverage every year, but it seems closer to the 11th, if not on the 11th. I found this to be odd because the President and the ones behind him were pushing for war, congress was meeting and discussing the pros and cons, most of the American people were posting online that they were against the war and suddenly both channels interrupted all their 'BREAKING NEWS!!' to put on hour(s) long 9-11 prerecorded programs. It seemed like propaganda to me to get us riled up against the middle easterners who attacked us and make us more in favor of war. I could be totally off base, it was just odd to me.