The rule for 4, 16, 36 is doubling each number.
The rule for 2, 13, 33 is a finite sequence. You start will adding 11 to 2 then adding 10 to 13 then adding 9 to 33 and so on until you get to 1
Excellent reasoning.... but it's still not the rule... 🙂
Pattern rule?
Pattern rule?
Very good...yes. What is the rule?
LOL Swan!!!!!! I'm going crazy.
A rule that defines a sequence or a pattern?
Things that are arranged to follow a pattern or a rule?
LOL Swan!!!!!! I'm going crazy.
A rule that defines a sequence or a pattern?
Things that are arranged to follow a pattern or a rule?
Here is another: 😀
4, 16, 36
2, 13,33
5, 9, 10 What's the rule?
Lord!!! my math was completely wrong on all of it. Horrible reasoning. I'm going to have to ask JJ.
LOL Swan!!!!!! I'm going crazy.
A rule that defines a sequence or a pattern?
Things that are arranged to follow a pattern or a rule?
Here is another: 😀
4, 16, 362, 13,33
5, 9, 10 What's the rule?
Feel free, everyone, to post three numbers and I will tell you if they follow the rule.... 😀
12,53,58
12,53,58
YES..! They follow the rule... What's the rule???
There is no pattern!!! Three random numbers is a row!!! Rule of 3!!!
There is no pattern!!! Three random numbers is a row!!! Rule of 3!!!
I'm going to agree with 'no pattern, per se' unless it is defined broadly. But a 'rule' applies to these numbers; including the numbers which you cited. Is the rule of 3 to mean that three numbers are documented? If so, that's not the rule. 🙂
They are in ascending order?
They are in ascending order?
YES..!!! They are in ascending order !!! That is the rule.
Frrrrantastic !
😀
I feel so silly. It was kinda cool that I unconsciously followed the pattern with I wrote down my 3 numbers.
I feel so silly. It was kinda cool that I unconsciously followed the pattern with I wrote down my 3 numbers.
No reason to feel silly at all. I think we cite numbers in ascending order all the time rather than not. When specified/ warranted, then we jump to another arrangement. In this case, the 'rule' was so obvious that we oversaw it - is this a long stretch of Occams Razor in a way? 😀
Well, I felt pretty silly when JJ read my answers and laughed at my math mistakes asking, "How did you come up with that???" Thank goodness that I am smart enough to know that math is not my forte and have an online math teacher for him.
Something different anyone?
Using the patterns and numbers given, complete the sequences below...
ENJOY!
Pls. explain how you reached your answer....:-)
ZA5, Y4B, XC6, W3D, _____
A. E7V
B. V2E
C. VE5
D. VE7
CMM, EOO, GQQ, _____, KUU
A. GRR
B. GSS
C. ISS
D. ITT
SCD, TEF, UGH, ____, WKL
A. CMN
B. UJI
C.VIJ
D. IJT
1. D
The letters are last letter, first letter, next to last, second letter, 3rd to last, 3rd letter ect.
The number pattern is alternating between 2nd and 3rd with the letters 5,4,6,3,7
2. C
First letter starts with C and then every other letter. Second and third letters start at M and skip every other letter.
3. C.
Start with S then to C and D. Then each letter after S followed by the next two letters in order after D.
1. D YES....
The letters are last letter, first letter, next to last, second letter, 3rd to last, 3rd letter ect.
The number pattern is alternating between 2nd and 3rd with the letters 5,4,6,3,72. C YES...!
First letter starts with C and then every other letter. Second and third letters start at M and skip every other letter.
3. C. YES....
Start with S then to C and D. Then each letter after S followed by the next two letters in order after D.
Congratulations guys!
Good work... 😀
A few Fractions anyone; just for fun ? ...:D
1) Solve for the '?':
3889 + 12.952 - ? = 3854.002
A. 47.095
B. 47.752
C. 47.932
D. 47.95
2) Which of the following is equal to 3.14 x 106 ?
A. 314
B. 3140
C. 3140000
D. None of these
Which of the following fractions is greater than 3/4 and less than 5/6?
A. 1/2
B. 2/3
C. 4/5
D. 9/10
What decimal of an hour is a second ?
A. .0025
B. .0256
C. .00027
D. .000126
Thought you might like this:
Gravitational waves detected, confirming Einstein's theory.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/12/science/ligo-gravitational-waves-black-holes-einstein.html
Thought you might like this:
Gravitational waves detected, confirming Einstein's theory.
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35524440?ocid=socialflow_facebook&ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbcnews&ns_source=facebook
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/12/science/ligo-gravitational-waves-black-holes-einstein.html
Thank you, Alana....
1) Solve for the '?':
3889 + 12.952 - ? = 3854.002
A. 47.095
B. 47.752
C. 47.932
D. 47.95...X
What decimal of an hour is a second ?
A. .0025
B. .0256...X
C. .00027
D. .000126
The others I have no clue!
Answer to #2 is C
Answer to #3 is C
- 4 Forums
- 32.9 K Topics
- 272.5 K Posts
- 1,391 Online
- 42.3 K Members