Every successful person has had assistance in someway or another via a priviledged upnbrining, a good education, an aunt or uncle, a neighbor, a coach, teacher. Personally, I would not have gone to college if not forgovernment assist and now I'm a productive member of society..not sure where I would be without my education and am forever grateful..I'm more then happy to pay taxes for public assistance.I believe there are very few people who want to actually live off of assistance....not all of us have wealthy relatives to take care of uswhen need be.some people need to get off their high horses and visit the real world.
Oops..not done..most people I know who are opposed to government assist are people from very priveledged backgrounds as if th hey havnt received aid....they got to the point they are all on their own...not.
Oops..not done..most people I know who are opposed to government assist are people from very priveledged backgrounds as if th hey havnt received aid....they got to the point they are all on their own...not.
We must have had different experiences growing up. My father was a postman and my mother a housewife. I attended public school and went to a state university. I got my first job, a paper route, at 13 and kept it until my 16th birthday. I started at Radio Shack on my 16th birthday. I worked at Radio Shack all through high school and my freshman year at college. I got a job as a teaching assistant at the university my sophomore year. My college was paid for by my parents and myself. I went to an in-state university because that's all we could afford. Not my first choice of schools. I was the first person in my family to go to college.
I grew up in an 800sf 2 bedroom house and shared a bedroom with my sister until I was 10. We then insulated the attic and I moved up there. I lived there until college when I moved into the dorm.
I am opposed to assistance because in my experience people can succeed if they try hard enough. Some people truly need help and should get it. Others take help because it is easy to get. Others make a lifestyle of needing help by repeatedly making poor decisions and needing to be bailed out. My wife and I both have family members who fall into this category.
I consider that to be a privledged background...believe it or not. Great support ......or should we call it assistance ? From somewhere. Raised in a stable home with two parents, I'm guessing well fed or nourished, I'm guessing father had good benefits and could take you for appropriate medical and dental care when needed,possibly encouraged tobgo to college ,strong work ethic modeled for you , a mother that was home after school and a good public education available to you..and parents to help pay for school. Do you think everyone grows up like this? You were very fortunate. Sorry to burst your bubble but sounds like you had a great deal of "assistance".
So let me understand. Because you had irresponsible parents, the government should take someone else's money away from them and give it to you. Money that they earned through honest work.
I would rather see the government require permits to have children. Require that the parents take parenting classes and prove financial responsibility. If the government is going to interfere in our lives I would rather them require that irresponsible people act responsibility rather than punish responsible people for the actions of irresponsible people.
My parents were responsible people. Fundamentalist Southern Baptists. You know that ole Protestant work ethic. When I was in high school and friends were getting cars. I asked my father if I could have a car. He said that as soon as I could afford to buy one and pay for the insurance I could have a car. He explained that life wasn't fair and he could not afford to buy me a car. He said that in life you just have to play the cards that you are dealt.
You seem to think that stealing someone else's cards is ok. That was not the way that I was raised. Then again my parents are conservative republicans.
Rotorhead - it seems your parents failed to remind you that the cornerstone of Catholicism is charity and taking care of one another. "He who dies with the most toys wins" is not a tenet of your parents religion. Before going off on "us" paying for children of irresponsible parents, you'll be happy to know that your personal contribution to welfare programs amounts to nickels from each paycheck. The bombs we've been dropping for the past 12 years cost over 1 million dollars a piece. Everyone that has a problem with the Government pulling a few nickels of your paycheck to feed hungry children but claim to be religious should have a talk with their Flock.
I'll leave comments about requiring permits to have children to the weekly white supremacist meetings.
It sounds like you had great parents.
You do realize to implement a program such as you are suggesting will.cost money? Where will the money come from?
I don't believe its stealing, I believe it is sharing to provide to others to create a better society for all to thrive which benefits everyone in the long run. Some of my.money goes to public schools..didn't you go to a public school? Public schoo is government assist. I don't mind giving /sharing money to those less fortunate to assist in creating a better person to allow productive participation in society. I th ink there in lies the disagreement...sounds like you do mind pitching in. Imagine life without such a great upbringing and assistance from your parents and the government., and/ or you have a profound mental and/or physical disability..where would you be?
So let me understand. Because you had irresponsible parents, the government should take someone else's money away from them and give it to you. Money that they earned through honest work.
I would rather see the government require permits to have children. Require that the parents take parenting classes and prove financial responsibility. If the government is going to interfere in our lives I would rather them require that irresponsible people act responsibility rather than punish responsible people for the actions of irresponsible people.
My parents were responsible people. Fundamentalist Southern Baptists. You know that ole Protestant work ethic. When I was in high school and friends were getting cars. I asked my father if I could have a car. He said that as soon as I could afford to buy one and pay for the insurance I could have a car. He explained that life wasn't fair and he could not afford to buy me a car. He said that in life you just have to play the cards that you are dealt.
You seem to think that stealing someone else's cards is ok. That was not the way that I was raised. Then again my parents are conservative republicans.
Interesting...so many things left unsaid, but understood anyway...
What do you think of this?
"In the past 10 years alone, Americans have given Israel the equivalent of approximately $200,000 per Israeli family of five. In addition, there have been weapons subsidies, loan forgiveness programs, special trade preferences, and other generous gifts from American taxpayers to Israel. In fact, despite being one of the world’ smallest nations, Israel receives more U.S. tax money than any other country. "
I don't mind giving /sharing money to those less fortunate to assist in creating a better person to allow productive participation in society.quote]
I don't believe most people mind helping someone become a productive member of society. That is what the welfare system was created for. The problem lies in what the system has become. I personally know of several people who live off the system and are more than capable (healthy, educated, functional) of being productive. One, when asked why she didn't get a job, told me "why should I when I can get all this money for doing nothing?". Another lies to the government stating she is a single parent to get more $ for her child's education - she is married & living with her spouse (both have good high paying jobs and make at least 4 times what I do). Before anyone asks, yes, I reported this abuse to the correct agency. What was done....nothing, nothing at all.
I watched a news report about the "free cell phone" program. They interviewed a woman who opened her purse and showed the reporter 12 cell phones she got in the past few days. Each came with 250 minutes. When asked why she had so many her response was, "why not, they are free". She just went to different locations in her city and got the phones - no ID needed, no tracking of it at all.
The free phone program -Lifeline - was started (I'm relying on memory now so don't flame me if I'm incorrect) under the Reagan administration to provide land line phones for shut-ins, disabled & elderly so they could always call for assistance. How did this get turned into the ridiculous program it is now? I believe we should still provide a means of contact for assistance, however, a land line will do or just a cell phone with NO service (you can always call 911 on any cell without a provider). Why do we have to provided multiple phones with 250 min each to people? How much is this costing tax payers?I do not object to helping to create productive members of society (as my previous post about having people provide 40 hours a week for their check - that is productive). I object to my money that I work hard to earn being used to create an entitlement society.
BTW - Sheiba, I grew up eating "government cheese & bread" as a kid. Yes, I had two parents growing up but they got divorced. I got my first job at 13 and a 30 hour a week job at 16. I worked my way through college, paid my own bills, finished a degree while working 40 hours a week AND taking a full credit load at the same time. Somehow I was able to become a productive member of society. Yes, I got assistance along the way in Pell grants but I used that assistance to become productive - that is what I think government assistance should do.
"In the past 10 years alone, Americans have given Israel the equivalent of approximately $200,000 per Israeli family of five. In addition, there have been weapons subsidies, loan forgiveness programs, special trade preferences, and other generous gifts from American taxpayers to Israel. In fact, despite being one of the world’ smallest nations, Israel receives more U.S. tax money than any other
Singling out a true ally in Israel, and ignoring the billions we give Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, etc., while not understanding the reasons why we give money to countries is troubling in 2012. Any American who isn't squarely behind Israel's struggle in that region, and anyone who views Hamas as victims is grossly uneducated on the subject.
@diving girl ]Wrong is wrong! People taking government assist when not needed is wrong and not the intended purpose. I don't advocate that behavior. Unfortunately we will always have a few bad seeds. That will ruin it for the good seeds. I believe its the exception and not the rule.
You received govt assist and benefitted society as a result. I'm not sure what your point is . Are you pro or con govt assist?
There are of course bad seeds in every system but I think a lot of misconceptions would be put to rest if those who would see an end to government subsidies in the form of food stamps, etc. actually fell on hard times and were forced to go through the whole application process. It's not a walk in the park by any remote stretch, the processing is rigorous, detailed and humbling, and the relief is minimal - but when you're reduced to circumstances requiring assistance, every little helps.
"In the past 10 years alone, Americans have given Israel the equivalent of approximately $200,000 per Israeli family of five. In addition, there have been weapons subsidies, loan forgiveness programs, special trade preferences, and other generous gifts from American taxpayers to Israel. In fact, despite being one of the world’ smallest nations, Israel receives more U.S. tax money than any other
Singling out a true ally in Israel, and ignoring the billions we give Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, etc., while not understanding the reasons why we give money to countries is troubling in 2012. Any American who isn't squarely behind Israel's struggle in that region, and anyone who views Hamas as victims is grossly uneducated on the subject.
Nobody mentioned Hamas...and "ally" is probably not a word you'd use if you became "educated".
We "give" money to countries (actually, the IMF "gives" money to countries...one as educated as yourself should know this. Money is "given" to countries in return for control of their governments...i.e., to create "puppet governments that will do the bidding of the "giver"...such as Pakistan allowing the US to violate its sovereignty and kill Pakistani civilians with drones...at will).
There is no formal treaty that lists the US and Israel as "allies"...if you find one, please educate us all and post a link.
Also educate yourself and read about the USS Liberty, and what the "ally" did to it.
While you're at it, educate yourself about Jonathan Pollard, who worked for the "ally".
A group from the "ally" set up cameras and filmed the destruction of the Twin Towers...then danced as they came down. Wonder how they knew when to be filming...
The list goes on.The "ally" recently did this:
"The Netanyahu government's Ministry of Immigrant Absorption is sponsoring advertisements in at least five American communities that warn Israeli expatriates that they will lose their identities if they don't return home.The Ministry is also featuring on its website a series of short videos that, in an almost comically heavy-handed way, caution Israelis against raising their children in America -- one scare-ad shows a pair of Israeli grandparents seated before a menorah and Skypeing with their granddaughter, who lives in America. When they ask the child to name the holiday they're celebrating, she says "Christmas."
Charity begins at home. You cannot bash American welfare recipients while supporting pouring billions of dollars into ANY foreign countries.
I won't go into the politics of the region, but yes, education is key. You could start by reading "The Thousand Year War In The Middle East" by Maybury...if you can find it.
Education is a double-edged sword.
It sounds like you had great parents.
You do realize to implement a program such as you are suggesting will.cost money? Where will the money come from?I don't believe its stealing, I believe it is sharing to provide to others to create a better society for all to thrive which benefits everyone in the long run. Some of my.money goes to public schools..didn't you go to a public school? Public schoo is government assist. I don't mind giving /sharing money to those less fortunate to assist in creating a better person to allow productive participation in society. I th ink there in lies the disagreement...sounds like you do mind pitching in. Imagine life without such a great upbringing and assistance from your parents and the government., and/ or you have a profound mental and/or physical disability..where would you be?
All programs cost money. I just feel better about programs that improve things more than programs which perpetuate the status quo. I believe a program that promoted responsible parenting is better than one that pours money into families generated by irresponsible parenting.
When it comes to sharing vs stealing, the difference that I see between the two is that sharing is something that you give voluntarily and stealing is something that is taken by force. I believe in sharing when I think the purpose is a good cause. I dislike having my money taken from me when I disagree with the cause. I believe that charity is a personal thing and not something that should be forced by government.
I believe and support public schools as well as public colleges. Most funds for schools comes from property taxes. Everyone participates in property taxes whether you own or rent property. Except for the people in public housing since they pay no property taxes.
I am against the US Tax system becoming more progressive. Obama is going to pay for more government programs by having the "rich" pay a little more. Their "fair" share. What is fair? I posted a link earlier on here from the US Treasury. It pointed out that the top 5% of earners already pay 51% of the income taxes despite only making 30% of the income. 49% pay no income tax. What is fair? Should the top 5% pay 75% of the income taxes? 100%? What is fair?
I believe in helping people who need assistance. As I stated earlier, I believe that the government can find useful things for people who need assistance to do. I have mentioned the CCC program several times as an example. People don't value free things as much as they value things that they work for. So, as an example, if we have an able bodied person who needs help; we could let them adopt a quarter mile of our roads and be responsible for it's upkeep. Keep it clean and repair potholes. Materials and tools provided by public works. Just an example. I know this program costs money but it leads to a better work ethic than just giving someone money for standing in line and filling out paperwork to qualify.
As for abuse of the system. Yes, divinggirl and I seem to have met more abusers of the system and you seem to have met truly needy people. Go figure? I wonder which is actually the truth.
Just an example of things that I have seen/heard since moving to the VI 14 years ago. Several years ago we were doing some construction here at the house. We hired a mason. A local man in his 50's. He was very friendly and talkative. As you walk around you hear the stories being told. He was very proud of the fact that he had 13 children with 8 different women. When I asked how he could support so many children, he just laughed and said that's not my problem that's the mothers problem. All of the other workers just laughed with him. Who do you think is paying to support all of those children? I believe that he should have been put into a forced labor camp and every penny that he made should have gone to supporting his children. Opinions vary.
Until moving here, I had never heard of the concept of "inside family" and "outside family". If you understand the terms then the question becomes how can this possibly lead to a well founded family? Unless the man is wealthy how can he support two or more families properly?
If the government wants to insert itself into out lives by deciding how our money is spent then at least put programs in place which fix problems not simply perpetuate them.
Wow this has really gotten off topic!
My original point was that it is sad that out of the 50 plus million we get here for food stamps our local farmers benefit very little from it. I also think that the food stamp program puts food related businesses such as restaurants at a disadvantage and allows the grocery stores and related businesses that take food stamps or benefit from them to do business in ways that give them an edge up and allow them to make more money than they would if there were no food stamps.
People here keep talking about giving individuals a chance to succeed and helping them out. But what about the person who is actually trying to make a success of themsleves and has to start out with the deck stacked against them because other related businesses indirectly get an unfair advantage through govt subisdies?
Oldtart, the food stamp program was streamlined in the past few years and it is very easy to get them. It is not the difficult process in which you describe.
"In the past 10 years alone, Americans have given Israel the equivalent of approximately $200,000 per Israeli family of five. In addition, there have been weapons subsidies, loan forgiveness programs, special trade preferences, and other generous gifts from American taxpayers to Israel. In fact, despite being one of the world’ smallest nations, Israel receives more U.S. tax money than any other
Singling out a true ally in Israel, and ignoring the billions we give Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, etc., while not understanding the reasons why we give money to countries is troubling in 2012. Any American who isn't squarely behind Israel's struggle in that region, and anyone who views Hamas as victims is grossly uneducated on the subject.
Please learn how to use the quote facility! You took a quote from JahRustyFerrari and turned it into a quote from me. I never mentioned Israel or Pakistan. Please preview and edit appropriately. Thank You.
My apologies Roto - no idea what happened there.
Oldtart, the food stamp program was streamlined in the past few years and it is very easy to get them. It is not the difficult process in which you describe.
And you say this from experience or hearsay?
Experience......when was the last time you went through this rigorous process that you describe?
My apologies Roto - no idea what happened there.
No problem. I think the quote function get confused when there are multiple nested quotes. It just requires previewing and editing to make it come out right. I was just trying to set the record straight. I get enough flak from what I actually say without getting things that I don't say attributed to me.
Experience......when was the last time you went through this rigorous process that you describe?
Three months ago.
"It's not a walk in the park by any remote stretch, the processing is rigorous, detailed"
Please elaborate then on what makes it so difficult..........
As another example of helping people vs handouts. I don't know what your experiences have been like on island but frequently when I shop at Pueblo in Golden Rock I will be approached by someone asking for money. They come right up to the car and ask for cash and won't go away easily. I think being an old white haired white guy I am a prime target.
I tell them, I don't give away money but what can you do? Can you rake leaves? Can you move rocks? What useful work can you do? I'll pick you up here tomorrow and pay you minimum wage. How many takers do you think I get? They usually run away as fast as they can.
Wow this has really gotten off topic!
And you seem surprised! LOL
Once I saw this topic, I knew it would go off-topic.
Simple questions or info. given on the General Forum, goes way off topic in which Islander had to close those topics/threads down or even remove them all together, to which this new forum has been created.
This new forum-Under a Coconut Tree, is almost a free for all.
I am taking a sabbatical from this website as to participating. I just read and sometimes kiss my teeth.
Have a good day everyone!
What do you think of this?
"In the past 10 years alone, Americans have given Israel the equivalent of approximately $200,000 per Israeli family of five. In addition, there have been weapons subsidies, loan forgiveness programs, special trade preferences, and other generous gifts from American taxpayers to Israel. In fact, despite being one of the world’ smallest nations, Israel receives more U.S. tax money than any other country. "
Israel was the largest recipient of US tax money with Egypt a fairly close second. Until recently. Now it is Afghanistan and Pakistan.
"Afghanistan remained the top recipient of total U.S. economic and military assistance—both obligations and disbursements—for a third consecutive year. Iraq had held the top spot from 2003 to 2007."
http://gbk.eads.usaidallnet.gov/data/fast-facts.html
If you check my comments on the "aiding and abetting" thread I also advocate that we do a little nation building at home before continuing to spend such large sums overseas.
BTW: I really like it if you make statements like the above quote about Israel that you include a link to your source so that we all know where you get your info. Thanks.
Why did we give $83 to Iceland?
- 4 Forums
- 33 K Topics
- 272.5 K Posts
- 197 Online
- 42.5 K Members