Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
So he has been charged with the murders but what evidence do they have that he did it? Seems like they only have the stalking stuff....
Posted : September 8, 2016 7:59 pm
Not sure what your point is. He was first arrested on the stalking charge and released on bond as the investigation continued and there has now been sufficient evidence to arrest him for the homicides and related charges.
Posted : September 8, 2016 8:13 pm
Topic starter
Not sure what your point is. He was first arrested on the stalking charge and released on bond as the investigation continued and there has now been sufficient evidence to arrest him for the homicides and related charges.
What sufficient evidence is that oldtart?
Posted : September 8, 2016 8:27 pm
Not sure what your point is. He was first arrested on the stalking charge and released on bond as the investigation continued and there has now been sufficient evidence to arrest him for the homicides and related charges.
What sufficient evidence is that oldtart?
Since when has any prosecutor EVER released any evidence before trial other than to the defense? When it's established that sufficient evidence has been gathered for an arrest, an arrest is made, the defendant is arraigned and the process continues. Criminal Law 101.
Posted : September 8, 2016 8:34 pm
Topic starter
Well it seems to me they released alot of details about the stalking charges so obviously you are wrong.
Posted : September 8, 2016 8:39 pm
Topic starter
Not sure what your point is. He was first arrested on the stalking charge and released on bond as the investigation continued and there has now been sufficient evidence to arrest him for the homicides and related charges.
What sufficient evidence is that oldtart?
Since when has any prosecutor EVER released any evidence before trial other than to the defense? When it's established that sufficient evidence has been gathered for an arrest, an arrest is made, the defendant is arraigned and the process continues. Criminal Law 101.
https://lawofselfdefense.com/more-mosby-evidence-cannot-be-released-before-trial/
Theres a good read for you oldtart. You might be old but it really seems like you need to grow up. Maybe you are upset that I posted the link before you, or maybe you are just a troll.
Posted : September 8, 2016 8:55 pm
I'm going to have to defend old tart here, although she is more than capable. The prosecutor only has to give evidence to the defense which is known as discovery. The article you referred to was in reference that Mosby stated that it couldn't be discussed or provided (which she is wrong) , but in the cases referenced it was basically to calm the masses. If the prosecutor wishes to discuss it, that is their decision, but they don't have to tell you or I what they have found in the case against the defendant.
Posted : September 9, 2016 12:36 am
Topic starter
Message Removed: Please revisit board rules.
Posted : September 9, 2016 2:06 am
Wow..someone's internet feelings got hurt?
Posted : September 9, 2016 3:54 am
Next thing they'll be blaming the "feds" for not keepng the coke from coming into the territory...
Posted : September 9, 2016 4:06 am
Seriously hurt...
Posted : September 9, 2016 2:20 pm
Topic starter
Message Removed: Please revisit board rules.
Posted : September 9, 2016 4:23 pm
